Professor
Barnhurst’s lecture was based upon the elements of storytelling, and the way stories
are analyzed. Before Barnhurst begins his lecture, he does an activity with the
students. He asks them to pair up and individually tell each other stories
about an important event or time in their own life. After the students complete the activity,
Barnhurst then discussed the stories with them and pin points the main details
which were represented in almost every story. Each pair related their story to
a specific time, event, place and people. Other than this, it was discussed
that you could sometimes figure out what another person’s story was about just
by the narrators body language and hand gestures and movements. This simple observation
is what Barnhurst explains is something that has been being analyzed by
theorists and trying to understand further. This simple activity and its findings I found relatable
to our discussion and lesson relating to non-verbal codes.
Barnhurst
states that the most important part of storytelling is the interpretation of
the story being told. Yet, there is always a clear pattern of storytelling. The
pattern described is announcement, description, action, resolution and
response. It makes sense to me that if a
story was told out of order or a part was left out that the story would not
make sense or would be very hard to interpret. This pattern can be related to
our lesson on Schramms model of Communication. The people sharing the story
being the sender and receiver, the message being the story, and the receiver having
to encode and decode the message for interpretation.
Unfortunately
Barnhurst’s lecture ends while he is still discussing the difference between
interpreting a story and judging it. If I had to finish the lecture and imagine
what Barnhurst what would have been said, I would believe that interpreting a
story would be the way you understand it, and internally accept what you are being
told. Judging the story would be your outward opinion of the story or topic,
and what information you choose to agree or disagree with and act upon.
It's weird that we don't even think about how we tell stories, yet we all tell it the same way... I found his lecture very interesting. It's unfortunate that it got cut off
ReplyDeleteThe connection between Barnhurst's lecture and Schramm's Model of Communication is a good one I think. When we tell stories, we don't simply start speaking until the whole story is finished without paying any mind to our listeners. Instead, we notice their reactions to what we say and continue our story accordingly, sometimes adding extra details if they seem confused, or excluding parts that wouldn't add any hilarity/drama/excitement to the story.
ReplyDelete