In professor
Meraz’s guest lecture, she discusses inequalities for women in the computer
science field.
She starts her lecture with some food for thought about
the idea of gender. She says that no men
notice gender until a woman steps into the room. This is just a way of saying that gender is
topic of concern when people of different genders are placed together, but when
they are segregated, neither gender really thinks about it. This idea relates to “cognitive dissonance,”
because it shows that when people are with peers of the same gender, they are
generally more relaxed, but when someone from another gender arrives, they
dedicate thought to the differences they have between each other, which can
sometimes be hard to understand completely.
She then introduces the term “the incredible shrinking pipeline”, which
is used to describe the ever shrinking number of women in the computer science
field. Professor Meraz then explains that computers are generally perceived as a “boy toy”. Diner Dash is a video game she shows the
class. It’s a game where the main
character is a waitress and the objective of the game revolves around
multi-tasking for the restaurant. She
uses this game to point out that games for women tend to revolve around “work”,
while games for men or more "leisurely".
I disagree with this, because male games can be just as stressful and
demanding as female games, even if the objectives are different.
The next
subject in her lecture is blogging, and how women are differentiated here as
well. She gives reasoning from both
women’s and men’s point of view for how and why this is, and then she gives
factual reasons. Some women believe
their blogs only receive male attention if the girls talk about sex or post
revealing pictures, while some men say that women are actually at an advantage,
because guys tend to favor a women’s post over a men’s, even if the content is
very similar. This discussion is then
tied into political blogging, and some of the women who have been successful at
it. Meraz then explains that the real
reason most women in the field are only designers, and not programmers or other high-ranking positions, is because men dominate the field, and rarely invite women to hold
these positions. One explanation she offers
is because men think women are too focused on feelings, and not firm enough in
their opinions. This is an example of
stereotyping. This also brings questions
about ethics. Is it ethical to exclude
women from positions like these? Probably not…
Finally, she concludes by saying that one of the reasons she covered
these topics is to show that sexism is quite prevalent on the internet.
Gender is an
example of a diffuse status. This whole
lecture was a discussion about what effects the diffuse status of women has on computer
science. Apparently, these effects are very great.
I also listened to this lecture and found it frustrating how everyone spends so much time analyzing how men and women are different and are being stereotyped and challenged when wanting to go into certain fields. To a certain extent I think the more we analyze the more we fuel the fire of the stereotyping.
ReplyDeleteI would have to agree though, a women can be more successful in the blog atmosphere if she's attractive. Take Jenna Marbles for example. She has over 1million fans that follow her YouTube blogs on a weekly basis. Sure, she is funny, but the fact that she's really pretty helps boost her popularity. If you ever read through comments people leave on her updates, lots of them include how "beautiful" she is and what not.
ReplyDeleteFabiola, I agree with you that the more we analyze this subject the more we fuel the fire of the stereotyping. I do not have a problem with working with women, and the best and most qualified person should get the job. So let follow that and stop making things worse by not letting it go.
ReplyDelete