As discussed in lecture, symbols can be anything from
letters and words to objects. Professor Barnhurst specializes and focused his
lecture on the sociology of young minds. In doing so he asked the class to
write out notes about stories and then broke down how story telling works. Symbols
are a major factor for breaking down the story telling process. Barnhurst
explained that people start with the abstract, for example: “I have a story to
tell you!” These simple words, or symbols, before a story prepare a person for
what is to come. Barnhurst explains that if you just started telling a story
without announcing in some way via use of symbols that you are in fact going to
tell a story, people would be confused. It would also seem pertinent to take
into account distance while speaking.
Story telling has these basic elements to it but the
language and symbols you would use for the audience and the content of the
story would be affected. If it is a deeply personal one, intimate distance is
used and so on and so forth up until public distance. This reiterates how
closely intertwined verbal and non-verbal communication are, that is it not
simply an either or but that how we physically present ourselves affects the
story’s interpretation (another step in story telling which actually, unlike
the rest of the steps, occurs simultaneously with all previous steps discussed
by Professor Barnhurst).
These next two steps of story telling, complicating action
and resolution, are most closely relatable to framing. Framing is how we use
symbols to convey our messages and stories in ways that are most beneficial to
us and / or to the situation. When the complicating action aspect of the story
comes into play we are typically saying things like, “you won’t believe what
happens next!” Everyone knows they have exaggerated a story a time or two
either to make it more interesting for the listener, to appear cooler or not
crazy, to impress or to defer and so on. Regardless of the reasoning when in
this step of story telling it would almost seem like a give that one would
frame to benefit themselves or others.
Resolution, the final step (besides the overall step of
interpretation), provides the “what happens next” of the story. This is also
relatable to framing because we all understand the feeling of thinking of a
great comeback much later after an argument or a flirtatious encounter and
thinking, “ugh why didn’t I say that instead?” Sometimes, without even
realizing you relay the story to a roommate or a friend or a parent and you may
alter just what you said, framing the story, to incorporate your much better,
much too late comeback.
Overall the steps of story telling are so basic that we
hardly think twice about the pattern involved. We forget or fail to realize
that we are choosing our symbols / language and framing them in such a way to
not only convey the story but in a way that allows for the proper
interpretation from the first step to the last.
Amy, You effectively relate the concepts of proxemics and framing to Barnhurst’s lecture. Also, you do a good job of going into detail about our use of symbols, and how they work in storytelling. Your entry shows that you understand the material. With the stories we tell, especially involving ourselves, we want to come off looking good!
ReplyDelete